Ray rogers shroud of turin carbon dating
From 1987 until 1992 he served on the Department of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board with the equivalent rank of Lt.General, and received a Distinguished Service Award.Other honors included being named a Tour Speaker for the American Chemical Society in 1971, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Distinguished Performance Award in 1984 and the Department of the Air Force Exceptional Civilian Service Medal in 1991. Rogers was appointed Director of Chemical Research for the Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) in 1978, applying thermal methods to the study of this relic.He also served as the editor for Energetic Materials, a peer-reviewed scientific journal from 1983-1988. In recent years, he further researched material relevant to the dating of the Shroud, publishing his findings in Thermochimica Acta.But he makes it hard by posting his thoughts in chunks that are halfway between a blog posting, diary entry and a scrambled egg.Here is a Texas Two-Step process for finding what he wants you to read: It’s an experiment that Dan Porter describes as a “success”.The Shroud of Turinbelieved by many to be the burial cloth of Jesus and one of the most venerated relics of the Christian churchwas declared a fake in 1988 by three independent scientific institutions.
Rogers also found alizarin, a dye produced from Madder root.
Dyed and Repaired In December 2003 Rogers received a sample of the shroud from a physicist colleague who had collaborated on STURP.
The sample was taken from the same strip of cloth distributed for carbon dating in 1988.
The material Rogers studied was from an area directly adjacent to the carbon 14 sample, an area known as the Raes corner. This was unexpected and and completely inexplicable. Fibers have popped out of the central part of the thread, and the fibers from the two ends point in opposite directions.
During actual weaving of the linen cloth, whenever a new length of thread had been introduced into the loom, the weavers had simply laid it in next to the previous length rather than splicing. Rogers and Arnoldi wrote: [The thread] shows distinct encrustation and color on one end, but the other end is nearly white . This section of yarn is obviously an end-to-end splice of two different batches of yarn.